Skip to content

Daily Field Report

Date :06/19/2025
Project No :2024C217
Client Company :Artisan
Arrival Time :06/19/2025 8:00
Onsite Hours :08:30
Name of the Project :Naturewalk - 7 Hills Amenities
Project Location :Dallas
Weather :cloudy
Departure Time :06/19/2025 16:30
ASEC Technician Name :Aminullah Azimi

Observations/Finding

As requested, a representative of AS Engineering & Consulting (ASEC) conducted a site visit to perform quality control inspection and testing services. Visual observation techniques were employed to verify compliance with project drawings/specifications, applicable codes, and approved material submittals.


2. Earthwork Activities

  • Placement and compaction of backfill materials were in progress in the following locations:

    • Water line trench at the entrance/pit area.

    • Backfill behind Retaining Wall #1.

  • During the observation, active placement of fill material was observed being performed in 1-foot lifts. Compaction was executed using a 12-ton sheeps-foot roller and trench compactors.


3. Compaction Testing

  • Compaction testing was carried out using a Troxler nuclear density gauge in accordance with ASTM D6938.

  • Additional verification was conducted with general probing, using a 3/8-inch diameter probe rod.

Test Results:

  • Water Line Trench:

    • Did not achieve the specified minimum 95% relative compaction based on maximum dry density (MDD) per the Standard Proctor method (ASTM D698).

    • Moisture content exceeded the specified permissible range, indicating the soil was overly wet.

  • Retaining Wall #1 Backfill:

    • Achieved the specified minimum 95% relative compaction per ASTM D698.

    • Our ASEC representative arrived on site to observe the placement of MSE retaining walls #1.It was noted that behind the block and in the cells, No. 57 stone was used.

      Every 2nd course a geotextile fabric was placed followed by an 8-inch compacted lift.

      No. 57 stone was utilized 1-foot behind the block and within the cells.

      No remedial recommendation was made.

Notes:

  • Moisture content was above the specified range. Under this condition, soils require scarification and aeration (moisture correction) prior to re-compaction. The contractor was notified but did not implement corrective action. Consequently, the trench was backfilled without achieving the required compaction.


4. Recommendations & Required Remediation

  1. Undercut and Remove Non-Conforming Material
    Excavate the inadequately compacted zones around the water line to a depth sufficient to remove all non-conforming soils.

  2. Moisture Conditioning
    Adjust the moisture content of the excavated soil to within ±2% of the laboratory-determined Optimum Moisture Content (OMC) before re-compaction

Thank you for the opportunity to support this project. Should you have any questions or wish to discuss these findings further, please feel free to contact us.

Technician Signature / DateAminullah Azimi, June 19, 2025
Reviewer Name / DateKenneth Mosman, July 17, 2025